The full text of Rule 12 at the JREF Forums reads, Attack the argument, not the arguer. Having your opinion, claim or argument challenged, doubted or dismissed is not attacking the arguer. Seems like a good idea in general, but some things just need to be said, ya know? Biting your tongue gets old and leads to hairy palms. Here are some choice comments about a few of the more...interesting... forum members. We're all thinking these kinds of things. I'm just writing them down. If you'd like somebody reviewed here, leave a comment somewhere. I'll see it. 



Saturday, January 30, 2010

Kitakaze

Methinks Kitakaze is not such a bad guy. He seems nice enough. But, dude, what's the obsession with Bigfoot? It's not real. We know it's not real. If there's no evidence for Bigfoot, which there isn't, then WTF are you talking about all the time?

Take a look at all the posts started by Kitakaze. Almost every single one of them is about Bigfoot. I mean, it's one thing to snipe at the occasional Bigfoot idiot who comes passing through, but do you really need to start new threads about it? You've written thousands of posts about Bigfoot and to what ends? You only help perpetuate the myth. If the myth is no fun, it goes away. There's nothing left to be said about Patterson Gimlin film. That played out 40 years ago.

Seriously, dude, shut up already. You're just as bad as the Bigfoot believers. Like Truthers, they just want to talk about Bigfoot because it's fun. You're no different. Free porn is out there. Make use of it. In the meantime, the only response is, "Bring me one, dead or alive, and we'll talk."  Do something useful with your life.

No comments:

Post a Comment