The full text of Rule 12 at the JREF Forums reads, Attack the argument, not the arguer. Having your opinion, claim or argument challenged, doubted or dismissed is not attacking the arguer. Seems like a good idea in general, but some things just need to be said, ya know? Biting your tongue gets old and leads to hairy palms. Here are some choice comments about a few of the more...interesting... forum members. We're all thinking these kinds of things. I'm just writing them down. If you'd like somebody reviewed here, leave a comment somewhere. I'll see it. 



Friday, January 29, 2010

Truthers

Yet another Truther was banned from the JREF today. This person was a sock puppet of another Truther. There appear to be 23 identities in all. In fact, it reads a little like Genesis:

pdoherty76 begat docker who begat laith who begat jessicarabbit who begat Shades_of_grey who begat stundie who begat Wizard who begat rebel who begat Aphelion who begat Jaguar who begat tonicblue who begat Traitorbasher who begat soundaddicted who begat NBachmann who begat Aqua323 who begat Cheers who begat JHarrow who begat theauthor who begat mchapman who begat Cracker who begat releaseeabode who begat Ragnarok who begat vinniem who got banned today.

Sorry, people, but this person is a nutjob, plain and simple. Why does the JREF even keep the 9/11 Conspiracy Theory forum alive? It's a waste of resources. Nothing is being accomplished. Nobody is learning anything. It's just a bunch of idiots being repeatedly humiliated by a group of people who enjoy humiliating idiots.

It's called codependency.
posted at
Labels: , ,

1 comment:

  1. AnonymousSeptember 23, 2010 at 7:26 AM

    Sorry, but you were wrong on the ragnarok one.

    ps. Just think, had i not decided to check through my old jref posts, i may never have encountered this baseless accusation.

    I was actually CJOK or something and LOUIS CYPHERE, so ner...

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)