The full text of Rule 12 at the JREF Forums reads, Attack the argument, not the arguer. Having your opinion, claim or argument challenged, doubted or dismissed is not attacking the arguer. Seems like a good idea in general, but some things just need to be said, ya know? Biting your tongue gets old and leads to hairy palms. Here are some choice comments about a few of the more...interesting... forum members. We're all thinking these kinds of things. I'm just writing them down. If you'd like somebody reviewed here, leave a comment somewhere. I'll see it. 



Friday, February 5, 2010

boyntonstu

This guy is wound up tighter than nun at a titty bar. Our buddy boyntonstu has just been suspended for the second time in a month. Maybe he's on the spiral towards being banned. It sure looks like it. Why do you have to go around pissed off all the time? Don't you ever have any fun? Or is ranting and raving fun for you?

This idiot loves to politicize everything. Recently he got his rocks off pointing out (incorrectly) that no Arab nations were helping in out Haiti, but good old Israel was right there, being the benevolent and peace loving nation it is. Hey, Stu, what happened in Haiti was a terrible tragedy. Common courtesy says you don't turn it into a pissing contest. That's what assholes do.

I think he's a Jew, but it's really hard to tell for sure. He just seems like a lonely old man who needs to argue all the time. He's convinced he's right no matter what, so any disagreement with him only reinforces his superiority. That forumites continue to engage him shows a distinct lack of critical thinking. Did James Randi envision a bunch of pricks arguing pointlessly when he started the board? Does he really want the likes of Stu doing little but provoking senseless arguments?

They should put together a fund raiser and buy the guy some time with a few hookers. Apparently his religion is okay with lesbians, so let him enjoy the show. Maybe he'd lighten up.

No comments:

Post a Comment